ReviewJournal of human genetics2025
Diversity challenges and reconciles genetics in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Russian FSHD registry: a first look at the cohort.Human genetics · 2026Article
- MYH2 as a Potential Modifier of Clinical Severity in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a rare genetic disease with an estimated prevalence of no more than 1 in 8000; however, it is among the most common myopathies affecting global populations. This condition is classically categorised into two genetic types, FSHD1 (MIM: 158900) and FSHD2 (MIM: 158901), which, although have different genetic causes, are phenotypically indistinguishable, manifesting as progressive muscle weakness primarily affecting the face and periscapular muscles, as well as other muscle groups in later stages. The intense efforts of clinical and basic studies to understand this disease have revealed the critical necessity for disease manifestation: ectopic activation of the embryogenic and germline gene DUX4 (double homeobox 4, MIM: 606009) in skeletal muscles and the genetic and epigenetic backgrounds allowing DUX4 expression. Thus, the potential target therapies of FSHD include silencing DUX4 transcription or blocking its translation. Although the central role of DUX4 in FSHD pathology has almost reached a consensus, the mechanism of its activation remains largely unclear. Notably, the clinical dissection of genotype-epigenotype-phenotype observations, including non-penetrant and asymptomatic carriers of permissive genetic backgrounds, highlights the yet unsolved clinical diversity with potential additional layers of DUX4 regulation or other disease-modifying factors. This review provides an overview of essential findings with potential implications for further understanding the mechanisms underlying diverse clinical cases of FSHD and endogenous DUX4 activation in FSHD pathology.
Identifiers
40957965What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.