ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Ontogeny of drug-induced fatty liver disease (DIFLD): from key initiating events to disease phenotypes.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural Alkaloids Against Liver Injury: Mechanistic Insights and Multi-Target Therapeutic Potential.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We conducted an expert review of clinical case reports on drug-induced fatty liver disease (DIFLD) to classify drugs according to distinct clinical phenotypes. Seven clusters were identified based on clinical, biochemical, and histological features reflecting drug toxic mechanisms: Cluster 0 (Control): Drugs with no known steatotic effects or clinical evidence of DIFLD. Cluster 1: Drugs with mild pro-steatotic effects, exacerbating existing metabolic steatosis without significant liver enzyme elevation. Cluster 2: Compounds causing moderate steatosis with mild hepatocellular damage, occasional enzyme increases, and delayed onset. Cluster 3: Agents causing severe mitochondrial dysfunction, ATP depletion, and lactic acidosis, initially without inflammation. Cluster 4: Drugs inducing inflammatory steatohepatitis with moderate elevations of liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP 90-700 U/L) but preserved liver function. Cluster 5: Drugs causing severe steatohepatitis with marked enzyme elevation (ALT, AST > 700 U/L) indicating significant liver injury and inflammation. Cluster 6: Compounds causing steatohepatitis with additional cholestasis and elevated bilirubin (> 11 mg/dL). Clusters 1 and 2 primarily impair β-oxidation and mitochondrial respiration, linked to high lipophilicity and typically lower daily doses. Cluster 3 involves mitochondrial DNA depletion and impaired lipid export. Clusters 4 and 5 combine mitochondrial and nuclear receptor disruption, often linked to higher daily doses. Cluster 6 combines steatosis-promoting mechanisms with bile acid transport disruption. This classification improves understanding of DIFLD phenotypes by linking clinical manifestations with drug physicochemical properties and toxicological mechanisms, aiding diagnosis and risk assessment of drug-induced steatosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.