Trial reportTargeted oncology2025
Belantamab Mafodotin with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Exposure-Response Analysis of the DREAMM-8 Study.
Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04484623 (A Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (B-Pd) Versus Pomalidomide Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (DREAMM 8)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Population PKPD Analysis of Belantamab Mafodotin, Soluble BCMA, and Serum M-Protein in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Applications of Pharmacometrics in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the phase 3 DREAMM-8 study (NCT04484623), belantamab mafodotin (anti-B-cell maturation antigen [BCMA] antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin F payload) with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (BPd) showed significant progression-free survival benefit in second-line or later relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
objectiveThis exposure-response analysis explored the relationship between belantamab mafodotin cycle 1 exposure and efficacy/safety and predicted the benefit-risk profile of belantamab mafodotin at an initial dose of 1.9 versus 2.5 mg/kg using DREAMM-8 data. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn the BPd arm of DREAMM-8, belantamab mafodotin was dosed at 2.5 mg/kg intravenously in cycle 1, then at 1.9 mg/kg every 4 weeks from cycle 2 onward. Cycle 1 belantamab mafodotin and free payload exposures derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis were used to perform exposure-efficacy/exposure-safety analyses for probability of/time to first event. Selected covariate effects were evaluated.
resultsHigher belantamab mafodotin cycle 1 exposure was associated with deeper response (higher probabilities of complete response or better [≥ CR] and minimal residual disease negativity), but not with grade ≥ 3 ocular adverse events (oAEs)/ophthalmic exam findings. Benefit-risk assessment showed that an initial belantamab mafodotin dose of 1.9 mg/kg instead of 2.5 mg/kg would result in reduction in probability of ≥ CR without reduction in oAEs/ophthalmic exam findings.
conclusionsAn initial belantamab mafodotin dose of 2.5 mg/kg for BPd yields deeper responses versus 1.9 mg/kg with minimal change in safety outcomes in RRMM. DREAMM-8 (NCT04484623) was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (21 July 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.