ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Effects of arousal and valence on standing kinematics and kinetics in young men: An approach using a motion capture system.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of arousal and valence on standing kinematics and kinetics in young men: An approach using a motion capture system.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emotional impact on body kinematics and kinetics during quiet standing was investigated using a motion capture system. Twenty-two participants stood on a force plate while viewing affective pictures for 72 s. The task was repeated six times under different picture conditions categorized by arousal (High and Low) and valence (Unpleasant, Neutral, and Pleasant). We analyzed variabilities of the center of mass, lower-limb joint angles (ankle, knee, and hip), and joint torques. Additionally, breathing parameters, including tidal volume, breathing rate, and minute ventilation, were estimated based on abdominal movements. The results showed that valence significantly influenced postural kinematics and kinetics, with unpleasant emotions reducing variabilities of the center of mass, ankle angle, and ankle torque, implying ankle-driven postural control. Additionally, pleasant emotions increased breathing rate. On the other hand, high arousal states increased tidal volume and minute ventilation compared to low arousal states. These findings suggest that emotional states manifest as changes in body kinematics and kinetics during quiet standing, extending upon traditional center of pressure (COP)-based reports. Our study provides new insights into emotional effects on physical responses and highlights the utility of standing parameters measured by motion capture systems for emotional detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.