Trial reportESC heart failure2025
Cardiometabolic outcomes with dapagliflozin after myocardial infarction by baseline ejection fraction: DAPA-MI.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiometabolic outcomes with dapagliflozin after myocardial infarction by baseline ejection fraction: DAPA-MI.ESC heart failure · 2025Trial
- Association of In-Hospital Dapagliflozin Initiation with Favorable left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- State-of-the-art management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: integrating diagnostic pathways, revascularization strategies, and guideline-directed therapy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsIn the randomized DAPA-MI clinical trial, 10 mg of dapagliflozin once daily improved cardiometabolic outcomes versus placebo after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients without established diabetes or heart failure (HF). We assessed associations between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiometabolic outcomes in DAPA-MI.
methodsThe primary outcome, assessed using the win ratio method, was the hierarchical composite of death, hospitalization for HF, non-fatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter, Type 2 diabetes, New York Heart Association classification at last visit and body weight decrease of ≥5% from baseline to last visit. For the present analysis, patients were categorized using LVEF at randomization (<50% or ≥50%).
resultsOf the DAPA-MI participants with available LVEF data who received ≥1 dose of study drug (n = 3751), 2913 (77.7%) had LVEF <50% and 838 (22.3%) had LVEF ≥50%. The primary hierarchical composite outcome resulted in a win ratio favouring dapagliflozin of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.57; P < 0.001) in patients with LVEF <50% and 1.32 (1.00, 1.73; P = 0.048) in patients with LVEF ≥ 50% (P interaction = 0.76). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with LVEF <30%, the primary hierarchical composite outcome resulted in a win ratio favouring dapagliflozin of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.61; P < 0.001). There were no significant interactions between baseline LVEF and any secondary outcomes.
conclusionsRegardless of baseline LVEF, dapagliflozin resulted in significant cardiometabolic benefits versus placebo, although there was no impact on the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.