ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Bumblebees learn to use antennal and tarsal taste to predict the presence of nectar rewards in flowers.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Soil salinity effects on pollen and pollinator visitation in a buzz-pollinated glycophyte, Solanum carolinense.American journal of botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning cues such as tastes associated with palatable food is an important mechanism animals have for foraging optimally. Insects can use gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in their mouthparts to detect nutrients and toxins, but they also taste compounds using sensilla on other organs such as their antennae and tarsi. Bees are adept at learning to associate floral traits with the presence of nectar rewards, but few studies have examined how they incorporate gustatory information from their antennae or tarsi detected on flower surfaces. Here, we characterize the ability of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to taste sugar, salt and bitter compounds using their antennae and then tested whether they could use this sensory information to associate it with rewarding artificial floral displays. We show that bumblebees have antennal GRNs sensitive to sugars, salts and bitter compounds and can use surface chemistry differences detected by their antennae and/or tarsi to learn about the presence or absence of flower rewards in a free-flight assay. Naïve bumblebees showed no detected spontaneous preferences toward or against any surface chemistry tested. Bumblebees performed best when sucrose surface cues were associated with rewards, but they could learn to associate any cue with the presence or absence of sucrose solution. Interestingly, the bees found it more difficult to associate quinine surface chemistry with the presence of reward than its absence. These results indicate that bees have the potential to learn to associate another floral trait - chemicals on the surfaces of petals - with the quality of floral rewards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.