Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40958689›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

Bumblebees learn to use antennal and tarsal taste to predict the presence of nectar rewards in flowers.

Michael J M Harrap, Rachel H Parkinson, Hannah Jones, Geraldine A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael J M HarrapDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0515-2348
Rachel H ParkinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-3178
Hannah JonesDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-8094
Geraldine A WrightDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-021X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S000402/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2020-393Schmidt AI FellowshipUniversity of Oxford
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning cues such as tastes associated with palatable food is an important mechanism animals have for foraging optimally. Insects can use gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in their mouthparts to detect nutrients and toxins, but they also taste compounds using sensilla on other organs such as their antennae and tarsi. Bees are adept at learning to associate floral traits with the presence of nectar rewards, but few studies have examined how they incorporate gustatory information from their antennae or tarsi detected on flower surfaces. Here, we characterize the ability of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to taste sugar, salt and bitter compounds using their antennae and then tested whether they could use this sensory information to associate it with rewarding artificial floral displays. We show that bumblebees have antennal GRNs sensitive to sugars, salts and bitter compounds and can use surface chemistry differences detected by their antennae and/or tarsi to learn about the presence or absence of flower rewards in a free-flight assay. Naïve bumblebees showed no detected spontaneous preferences toward or against any surface chemistry tested. Bumblebees performed best when sucrose surface cues were associated with rewards, but they could learn to associate any cue with the presence or absence of sucrose solution. Interestingly, the bees found it more difficult to associate quinine surface chemistry with the presence of reward than its absence. These results indicate that bees have the potential to learn to associate another floral trait - chemicals on the surfaces of petals - with the quality of floral rewards.

Indexed as

Arthropod AntennaePlant NectarTasteAnimalsBeesFlowersLearningRewardTaste PerceptionPlant NectarBeesBehaviourCognitionElectrophysiologyGustationInsects

Identifiers

PMID40958689
PMCPMC12579952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.