ArticleJSES international2025
Polyethylene wear: an under-reported cause of failed shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glenohumeral allograft capsular reconstruction for recalcitrant instability of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a novel technique.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polyethylene (PE) wear after shoulder arthroplasty is a rarely reported cause of failure. The goal of this study was to present the clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative findings in a consecutive series of patients who presented with PE wear after shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Data of patients who presented with features of PE wear between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. Patient demographics and historical data regarding index surgery, implant characteristics, and manufacturer information were collected. Upon presentation after index arthroplasty, chief complaints, radiographic features, and clinical examinations were analyzed. Intraoperative findings and surgical management were reviewed in patients who underwent revision. Results: 43 patients were included in this study. The average time after index surgery to initial presentation was 12.1 ± 4.8 years after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and 8.3 ± 3.4 years after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The most common chief complaint was new onset pain for 77% of patients with prior aTSA and new onset instability in 57% of patients with prior rTSA. Most (>80%) aTSA glenoid components and rTSA humeral liners were comprised of conventional, noncrosslinked PE. All patients had radiographic evidence of proximal humeral bone loss. 65% of patients underwent revision with aggressive soft tissue débridement and synovectomy. Implant management was based on bone loss, presence of implant loosening, and soft tissue findings. Conclusion: Surgeons should be aware of the possible sequelae of PE wear in patients after shoulder arthroplasty, especially those with conventional, noncrosslinked PE. New onset pain and weakness after a symptom-free holiday (years) are common after aTSA. New onset instability and pain after a symptom-free holiday (years) are common after rTSA. Radiographic findings can include humeral and glenoid bone loss, a narrowed glenoid clear space, and eccentricity of the articulation. The diagnosis is provisionally made and confirmed intraoperatively. Revision poses unique challenges and should include aggressive synovectomy, débridement, and individualized bone loss management. Further studies are crucial for understanding this emerging phenomenon after shoulder arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.