Trial reportFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
An NGS-assisted diagnostic workflow for culture-independent detection of bloodstream pathogens and prediction of antimicrobial resistances in sepsis.
Trial report in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular diagnosis of sepsis in hospital patients: assessment of the Agata SepsisBMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Hybrid-sport participation is associated with gut microbiota composition: an exploratory longitudinal study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of microbial diversity and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with and without malignancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Sequencing Technologies for Detecting Antimicrobial Resistance in Bloodstream Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Analysis of the effectiveness of improving the testing rate of pathogenicity specimens prior to the use of antibiotics in Shandong Province, 2014-2023.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A critically ill adolescent with EBV-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-induced hyperinflammatory shock: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely and accurate identification of bloodstream pathogens is critical for targeted antimicrobial therapy in sepsis. Conventional blood cultures remain the Standard-of-Care (SoC) for pathogen identification but are limited by low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround times, hampering timely and targeted antimicrobial stewardship. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) offer potential for culture-independent, rapid, and comprehensive detection of pathogens and prediction of antimicrobial resistance. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of PISTE™ technology, an NGS-based diagnostic workflow combining full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomic analysis for the diagnosis of circulating bacteria in sepsis. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, phase IIa proof-of-concept study, adult patients with suspected sepsis were enrolled from four hospitals in Athens, Greece. Blood samples were collected prior to antibiotic initiation and processed using SoC cultures and PISTE platform. PISTE integrates automated DNA purification (KingFisher, Thermo Fisher Scientific), full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, metagenomics analysis (SQK-PRB114.24, Oxford Nanopore Technologies), and real-time sequencing using Oxford Nanopore GridION Mk1b device. A dedicated analysis pipeline was developed for accurate pathogen detection and prediction of antimicrobial resistance profiles. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic concordance between PISTE and SoC cultures. Results: A total of 100 patients (median age 79 years, median Charlson's Comorbidity Index 5) were enrolled. Of these, 71 patients met Sepsis-3 criteria. In this subgroup, PISTE showed an overall accuracy of 95.7%, with a sensitivity of 91.7%, specificity of 96.5%, positive predictive value of 84.6%, and negative predictive value of 98.2% compared to SoC. The median time to pathogen identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) with PISTE was 12.0 hours, significantly faster than in SoC cultures (30.4 hours, p < 0.0001). Resistance gene profiling showed strong agreement with SoC AST results, particularly for β-lactam and carbapenem resistance. Conclusions: PISTE technology exhibited high diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduced turnaround time compared to conventional cultures, supporting its potential as a short turnaround time and reliable diagnostic tool for bloodstream infections. Further optimization and validation in larger cohorts are warranted to enhance clinical implementation and improve antimicrobial stewardship in sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.