ReviewMedComm2025
Transforming Cancer Diagnostics: The Emergence of Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Markers.
Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-enabled liquid biopsy in cancer: a systematic review and meta- analysis of diagnostic performance and biological implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Epigenetic Plasticity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- Mapping the path to clinical implementation of multi-omics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Review
- The role of histone methylation in fibrosis and its therapeutic potential.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- The role of epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Targeting tumor transition windows.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Transforming Cancer Diagnostics: The Emergence of Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Markers.MedComm · 2025Review
- Methylation profiling in neuropathological tumors diagnosis: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy represents a transformative approach in oncology, enabling noninvasive disease detection and monitoring through epigenetic signals in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), nucleosomes, and noncoding RNAs. Tumor initiation is driven by epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone alterations, and dysregulated noncoding RNAs, which disrupt gene regulation, cell cycle control, DNA repair, and metastatic processes. This review systematically examines recent evidence on DNA methylation, histone marks (e.g., H3K27me3, H3K18ac), and noncoding RNAs (miRNAs, lncRNAs) as biomarkers for early cancer detection, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Particular focus is placed on aberrant DNA methylation (e.g., hypermethylation of CDKN2A, RASSF1A) and altered histone modifications (e.g., EZH2-mediated silencing) as indicators of tumor heterogeneity and evolution. Stable and specific in biofluids, noncoding RNAs such as oncogenic miR-21, tumor-suppressive miR-34a, and metastasis-associated MALAT1/HOTAIR further enhance clinical applicability. Recent detection methods, including bisulfite sequencing, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq, have advanced biomarker profiling, though challenges remain in standardization and low-abundance detection. With over 12 active clinical studies validating their utility, integration of epigenetic markers with AI and multiomics holds promise for individualized, dynamically guided oncology care. Future innovations, such as chromatin accessibility analysis and cfDNA fragmentation profiling, may further refine diagnostic precision and therapeutic monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.