Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959208›Full record

ReviewMedComm2025

Transforming Cancer Diagnostics: The Emergence of Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Markers.

Debalina Saha, Pritam Kanjilal, Mandeep Kaur, Soumya V Menon, Ayash Ashraf, M Ravi Kumar, Taha Alqahtani, Shikha Atteri, Daniel Ejim Uti, Bikram Dhara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The role of epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  8. Targeting tumor transition windows.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Debalina SahaDepartment of Microbiology St. Xavier's College (Autonomous) Kolkata India.
Pritam KanjilalDepartment of Microbiology St. Xavier's College (Autonomous) Kolkata India.
Mandeep KaurDepartment of Sciences Vivekananda Global University Jaipur Rajasthan India.
Soumya V MenonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University) Bangalore Karnataka India.
Ayash AshrafChandigarh Pharmacy College Chandigarh Group of College, Jhanjeri Mohali Punjab India.
M Ravi KumarDepartment of Chemistry Raghu Engineering College Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh India.
Taha AlqahtaniDepartment of Pharmacology College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University Abha Saudi Arabia.
Shikha AtteriChandigarh Pharmacy College Chandigarh Group of College, Jhanjeri Mohali Punjab India.
Daniel Ejim UtiDepartment of Research and Publications Kampala International University Kampala Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-1785
Bikram DharaCenter for Global Health Research Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Chennai India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-1994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy represents a transformative approach in oncology, enabling noninvasive disease detection and monitoring through epigenetic signals in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), nucleosomes, and noncoding RNAs. Tumor initiation is driven by epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone alterations, and dysregulated noncoding RNAs, which disrupt gene regulation, cell cycle control, DNA repair, and metastatic processes. This review systematically examines recent evidence on DNA methylation, histone marks (e.g., H3K27me3, H3K18ac), and noncoding RNAs (miRNAs, lncRNAs) as biomarkers for early cancer detection, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Particular focus is placed on aberrant DNA methylation (e.g., hypermethylation of CDKN2A, RASSF1A) and altered histone modifications (e.g., EZH2-mediated silencing) as indicators of tumor heterogeneity and evolution. Stable and specific in biofluids, noncoding RNAs such as oncogenic miR-21, tumor-suppressive miR-34a, and metastasis-associated MALAT1/HOTAIR further enhance clinical applicability. Recent detection methods, including bisulfite sequencing, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq, have advanced biomarker profiling, though challenges remain in standardization and low-abundance detection. With over 12 active clinical studies validating their utility, integration of epigenetic markers with AI and multiomics holds promise for individualized, dynamically guided oncology care. Future innovations, such as chromatin accessibility analysis and cfDNA fragmentation profiling, may further refine diagnostic precision and therapeutic monitoring.

Indexed as

cancer diagnosticsDNA methylationepigenetic markersliquid biopsynoncoding RNAs

Identifiers

PMID40959208
PMCPMC12433903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.