ReviewCureus2025
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Cardiac ICU: Digital Integration, Predictive Analytics, and Perioperative Inflammation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate SEP-1 Measure Compliance and Fluid Management in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Difficult Airways: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing availability of complex healthcare data, combined with advances in computational methods, has opened new avenues for improving critical care. Intensive care units (ICUs) generate continuous, multimodal data streams, ranging from vital-sign waveforms to laboratory results and clinical notes that place a substantial cognitive burden on clinicians. In recent years, significant focus has emerged on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and the ICU. With an increase in interest and improvement in patient outcomes due to AI use in the ICU, there is a need for an updated summary of current evidence. This review highlights the growing promise of AI in several ICU domains. AI subdomains, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, have been shown to accurately predict patient deterioration events such as sepsis, organ failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) hours in advance. AI-driven image interpretation can enhance diagnostic accuracy in radiology and pathology, and continuous monitoring algorithms can reduce false alarms. In conclusion, AI shows promise for critical care by enabling earlier risk detection, personalized therapy, and optimized resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.