Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959327›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine: A Literature Review.

Ahmed M Abdelbaky, Wael G Elmasry, Ahmed H Awad, Sarrosh Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed M AbdelbakyCritical Care Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, ARE.
Wael G ElmasryAnaesthesiology, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, ARE.
Ahmed H AwadCritical Care Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, ARE.
Sarrosh KhanInternal Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing availability of complex healthcare data, combined with advances in computational methods, has opened new avenues for improving critical care. Intensive care units (ICUs) generate continuous, multimodal data streams, ranging from vital-sign waveforms to laboratory results and clinical notes that place a substantial cognitive burden on clinicians. In recent years, significant focus has emerged on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and the ICU. With an increase in interest and improvement in patient outcomes due to AI use in the ICU, there is a need for an updated summary of current evidence. This review highlights the growing promise of AI in several ICU domains. AI subdomains, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, have been shown to accurately predict patient deterioration events such as sepsis, organ failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) hours in advance. AI-driven image interpretation can enhance diagnostic accuracy in radiology and pathology, and continuous monitoring algorithms can reduce false alarms. In conclusion, AI shows promise for critical care by enabling earlier risk detection, personalized therapy, and optimized resource utilization.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndrome (ards)artificial intelligence (ai)critical careicu (intensive care unit)sepsis

Identifiers

PMID40959327
PMCPMC12434637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.