ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Hydrotherapy and acupressure for restless legs syndrome: results of a qualitative part of a randomized controlled exploratory study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) has a negative impact on quality of life and remains challenging to treat. This study explored the subjective experiences of individuals using two self-managed, non-pharmacological interventions-hydrotherapy and acupressure-for RLS, focusing on their perceived benefits, challenges, and feasibility in everyday life. Methods: Within a three-armed randomized study we conducted qualitative interviews in both intervention groups. The semi-structured interviews were coded and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Coding followed both an inductive approach, grounded in the data, and a deductive approach, guided by the study objectives. Data analysis was carried out using MAXQDA® software. Results: A total of 12 telephone interviews (six per intervention group) were qualitatively analyzed. Participants had a mean age of 65 years (range 35-75). Six themes emerged: prior experiences, motivation, study document perception, treatment integration, perceived impact, and post-intervention use. Both groups reported symptom and sleep improvements. Increased mindfulness was more common in the acupressure group. Hydrotherapy participants noted sensory effects but also discomfort and time barriers. Both interventions were seen as practical, with acupressure being perceived as easier to apply. Conclusion: Participants of both groups reported varying degrees of RLS symptom improvement. High-quality confirmatory RCTs are needed to investigate the effectiveness of acupressure and hydrotherapy, with a focusing on practical implementation and the need for comprehensive, continuous guidance. Treatments in RLS should be location-independent to improve both participation and outcomes. Future research should further explore individualized adaptations and contextual factors influencing treatment experience and effectiveness. Trial registration: Identifier DRKS00029960.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.