ArticleCurrent transplantation reports2025
Non-HLA Genetics and Application to Living Donor Candidates.
Article in Current transplantation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Population-Specific Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: This review examines the expanding role of non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) genetic factors in kidney transplantation, with a particular focus on their implications for living donor evaluation and outcomes. It emphasizes the potential of genetic testing to improve risk stratification beyond conventional HLA matching, especially for donor candidates with a family history of hereditary kidney disease. Recent Findings: Non-HLA genetic mismatches, including single nucleotide variants affecting minor histocompatibility antigens, can drive alloimmune responses, leading to graft rejection and failure even in HLA-matched transplants. The presence of non-HLA antibodies further contributes to adverse immunological outcomes. Genetic testing in related living donors can uncover monogenic kidney diseases, enabling early identification of at-risk individuals and enhancing donor safety. While polygenic risk scores and gene panels show promise in predicting complications and guiding post-transplant care, most genome-wide association studies have focused on recipients. There remains a significant gap in understanding how donor-specific genetic factors influence post-donation kidney function and long-term health outcomes. Summary: The integration of non-HLA genetic testing into living donor evaluation supports a precision medicine approach to kidney transplantation, offering improved risk assessment and donor-recipient matching. As the field advances, longitudinal studies and robust data collection, particularly around donor genetics, are essential to optimize transplant outcomes, inform clinical decision-making, and uphold ethical standards in donor care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.