Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Raman spectroscopy for agricultural applications.

Isaac D Juárez, Dmitry Kurouski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isaac D JuárezDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United States.
Dmitry KurouskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United States.

Funding

Regulatory Science in Environmental Health and ToxicologyT32ES026568 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu, Natalie M Johnson · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES026568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, we observe a significant interest in Raman spectroscopy expressed by plant biologists and other agriculturalists. However, many of these people have limited experience in Raman analyses. To this end, we wrote an extensive method-focused manuscript in which we critically discuss key steps in analyses for spectroscopic data. We also conveyed the major differences between analysis of certain peaks vs the full spectra, as well as discussed how both types of spectral analyses could complement each other. We also focused on chemometric analysis of data, including supervised methods, such as PLS-DA. Using our own data, we demonstrated a contribution of spectral preprocessing, model parameters and validation in the performance of supervised methods in data classification. We also critically discussed practical applications of peak fitting and 2-D correlation spectroscopy and demonstrated how these approaches can be useful to extract valuable information about biological processes that take place in plants.

Indexed as

2D-COSAnovapeak shiftingPLS-DAresponse characterization

Identifiers

PMID40959548
PMCPMC12434057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.