Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959967›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2025

Biosocial Factors Shaping Perceptions of Disease Risk Among a Community-Based Sample of Sexual and Gender Minority People Living in Toronto During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

James K Gibb, Sarah Williams, Kaspars Mikelstiens, Jada Charles, Leela McKinnon, Laura Beach, Luseadra McKerracher, Jessica Fields

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James K GibbDepartment of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-5433
Sarah WilliamsDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6852-0980
Kaspars MikelstiensDepartment of Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.
Jada CharlesDepartment of Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3201-4346
Leela McKinnonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-7438
Laura BeachDepartment of Law & Legal Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-8424-1870
Luseadra McKerracherDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-6896
Jessica FieldsDepartment of Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9800-6440

Funding

CIHR #181602Toronto COVID-19 Action Initiative #508850University of TorontoUniversity of Toronto Scarborough
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected vulnerable populations, including sexual and gender minority (SGM) people. Food insecurity, prevalent among this population, may influence perceived vulnerability to infection and related psychological outcomes. This study investigated the association between food insecurity and perceived vulnerability to infection among SGM adults in Toronto, Canada, during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted with 338 self-identified SGM adults recruited via respondent-driven sampling to complete an internet-based survey between March and July 2021. Measures included food security status, germ aversion, perceived infectability, and COVID-19 worry. Structural equation modeling (SEM) examined pathways linking food insecurity, discrimination, sleep quality, and perceived vulnerability to disease, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic covariates.

resultsThe SEM showed that discrimination predicted increased food insecurity (β = 0.30, p < 0.001) and poorer sleep quality (β = 0.26, p < 0.001). Sleep quality mediated the relationship between food insecurity and perceived vulnerability to disease (indirect effect = 0.16, p < 0.001). Discrimination had a significant total effect on perceived vulnerability to disease (β = 0.22, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the roles of food insecurity, discrimination, and sleep quality in shaping perceptions of disease vulnerability and risk among SGM people. Interventions addressing food security, mental health, and structural inequities are crucial for mitigating health disparities both during public health crises and in everyday life.

Indexed as

COVID-19Food InsecuritySexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sleep QualityYoung Adultbehavioral immune systemfood insecurityLGBT healthperceived infectabilitystructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID40959967
PMCPMC12441999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.