ArticleActa neuropathologica2025
Spatial transcriptomic analysis reveals lack of response to PD-1 blockade in recurrent glioblastoma.
Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Glioblastoma: epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and therapeutic resistance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- MR-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Case Report With Novel Insights Into Histopathological Changes and Immunological Responses.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2026Article
- Article
- The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Engineered nanomedicine remodels the postoperative cavity microenvironment to suppress glioblastoma recurrence.Theranostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed treatment for several cancers, yet clinical trials of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in glioblastoma (GBM) have consistently failed to show therapeutic benefit. While some studies have reported treatment-related transcriptional changes, particularly in T cells, findings remain limited and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) after PD-1 blockade in recurrent GBM using spatial transcriptomics. We performed Digital Spatial Profiling (GeoMx, NanoString) on FFPE tumor samples from 26 patients with matched primary and recurrent IDH-wildtype GBM, including 16 patients who received neoadjuvant nivolumab at recurrence. Tumor (SOX2⁺) and TAM (IBA1⁺) segments were selected for targeted spatial analysis. Following quality control and filtering, transcriptomic profiles were compared between nivolumab-treated and untreated recurrent tumors. PD-1 blockade did not induce detectable gene expression changes in either tumor cells or TAMs. There were no significant differences in global expression profiles or in more targeted analyses of malignant cell states, cell cycle activity, interferon signaling, or myeloid transcriptional programs. These results consistently indicate that neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade does not elicit measurable responses at the spatial transcriptomic level in tumor cells or TAMs in recurrent GBM. These findings align with the lack of clinical benefit observed in trials and highlight the need for alternative strategies to improve immunotherapy outcomes in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.