ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
A novel technique for monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials during brainstem surgery: an illustrative case series.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy in Primary CNS Tumors: Bridging Biology, Technology, and Clinical Care.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery: A critical appraisal of established practices, ongoing controversies, and future trajectories.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surgical management of brainstem tumors and cavernous malformations represents one of the most demanding challenges in neurosurgery, given the critical concentration of eloquent neural structures in this region. These include nuclei, cranial nerve roots and their corticonuclear tracts, corticospinal and spinothalamic pathways. Intraoperative injury to these critical structures may result in permanent neurological deficits, including progressive sensory deterioration during the postoperative course. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the functional state of the spinothalamic tracts during surgery is essential. Peripheral somatosensory evoked potentials (pSEP) have some disadvantages and limitations during such procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique for monitoring SEPs during brainstem surgery, termed brain stimulus-induced somatosensory evoked potential (bsiSEP). Continuous bsiSEP monitoring by direct stimulation of the floor of the fourth ventricle and recording of cortical responses from the scalp was performed in five consecutive patients with brainstem lesions (3 medulla oblongata tumors, 1 tumor and 1 cavernous malformation of the pontine tegmentum) undergoing microsurgical resection. Preoperative and postoperative neurological sensory deficits, neurophysiological data, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Continuous bsiSEP monitoring was available and reproducible in all cases, although 3 patients had varying degrees of preoperative sensory neurological impairment. One patient experienced a worsening of sensory symptoms. The results of the bsiSEPs were consistent with the neurological status of the patients after surgery in all cases. Peripheral SEPs were available in four cases, but all showed false-positive results. Continuous monitoring of bsiSEP is a reproducible technique and can predict outcome during brainstem surgery. It may improve the monitoring of spinothalamic tracts and overcome the limitations of pSEPs. This technique needs further refinement, but could be used during brainstem surgery to reduce postoperative sensory deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40960529What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.