Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40960633›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2025

Is obesity a protective factor in pediatric trauma? A retrospective review in a tertiary trauma centre over the decade.

Phoenix W Y Wong, Kenneth K Y Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phoenix W Y WongDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kenneth K Y WongDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. kkywong@hku.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe obesity paradox has been demonstrated in the adult trauma population. Yet there are conflicting results in children. The study aims to investigate the effect of childhood obesity on the outcomes after sustaining trauma.

methodAll children (< 18-year-old) who attended a tertiary trauma centre from January 2010 to March 2022 due to impact trauma were included. The obese group was defined by a body weight > 95th percentile for age, and others were in the non-obese group. Outcomes, including injury-severity-scores (ISS), morbidity/mortality and length-of-stay (LOS), were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were performed on causes of injury and age groups. Severe injury was defined by ISS > 15.

results148 subjects were included in the analysis (23 in the obese group; 123 in the non-obese group). They were similar in terms of injury causes and outcomes. The obese group had longer LOS (4 days vs 2 days, p = 0.022), and a higher proportion of them had severe injuries when < 11-year-old (28.6% vs 9%, p = 0.034).

conclusionIn contrast to adults, childhood obesity appears not to be a protective factor in trauma, and may be a risk factor, especially in younger children, for more severe injuries. Careful evaluation of obese children sustaining trauma is warranted to prevent injuries from being overlooked.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesityWounds and InjuriesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLength of StayMaleProtective FactorsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersTrauma CentersObesityPaediatricRisk factorsTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40960633
PMCPMC12443894

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.