ArticleJAMA surgery2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging in Assessing Nonviability of Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastasis.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02781935 (Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Liver Metastasis to Improve Surgical Planning), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Liver Metastasis to Improve Surgical Planning
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management Strategies for Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastases After Systemic Chemotherapy: Long-Term Outcomes and Preoperative Prediction of 'True Complete Response'.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Current and Future Perspectives of Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Interventional oncology: A primer for clinicians on the role of ablation and embolization for solid tumors.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), the optimal treatment of disappearing liver metastases (DLMs) diagnosed on postchemotherapy computed tomography (CT) is controversial. Objective: To examine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (diffusion weighted, T1/T2, and contrast enhanced) and CT for accurate assessment of the nonviability of DLMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective international study including patients with initially unresectable CLMs downstaged to liver resection after chemotherapy at 21 centers in France, Austria, Belgium, the US, and Japan. A total of 233 patients were registered and 112 were enrolled between November 2016 and March 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical cutoff was in September 2023, and data were analyzed from August 2024 to May 2025. Exposures: Postchemotherapy evaluation with both CT and MRI was performed. DLMs were defined as lesions that had disappeared on CT. Confirmed DLMs (cDLMs) were defined as those that had disappeared on both CT and MRI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI and CT in assessing the nonviability of cDLMs using either pathological complete response (for resected lesions) or the absence of recurrence at the site of cDLMs during the 2-year follow-up (for lesions left behind) to confirm the true lesion status. The planned sample size was 149 evaluable cDLMs, aiming at excluding an NPV of 0.85 or lower with a 1-sided α of 5% and a power of 90%. Results: Among 112 total patients (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [10.4] years; 67 [59.8%] male) a total of 152 cDLMs and 227 DLMs were evaluable. The NPV of all evaluable cDLMs, either resected or left behind, was 62.5% (95/152; 90% CI,50.8-74.2), which was lower than the prespecified threshold. The NPV of DLMs was 52.9%. The NPVs of resected cDLMs vs those left behind were 56.8% (50/88; 90% CI, 44.2-69.5) and 70.3% (45/64; 90% CI, 48.6-92.0), respectively. For patients without extrahepatic metastases who had R0/1 resection, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival and overall survival between those with all cDLMs removed vs those with at least 1 cDLM left behind. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the combination of MRI and CT was more accurate in detection of nonviable DLMs compared to CT alone, cDLMs did not correspond to nonviability in patients with initially unresectable CLM. Survival benefit associated with removal of cDLMs is still unclear in this setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02781935.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.