ArticleCell reports. Medicine2025
Pancreatic cancer risk prediction using deep sequential modeling of longitudinal diagnostic and medication records.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A deep learning model to dynamically predict cancer-associated thromboembolism in large-scale healthcare systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Research on the role and mechanisms of Cystatin 6 in disease pathosis and development.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a rare, aggressive cancer often diagnosed late with low survival rates, due to the lack of population-wide screening programs and the high cost of early detection methods. To enable early detection of high-risk individuals, we develop a transformer-based model trained on longitudinal Veterans Affairs electronic health record (EHR) with 19,426 PDAC cases and ∼15.9 million controls. Our model combines diagnostic and medication trajectories to predict PDAC risk within a 6-, 12-, and 36-month assessment window. Incorporating medication significantly improved performance; among the top 1,000-5,000 highest-risk patients in a cohort of 1 million patients, 3-year PDAC incidence is 115-70 times higher than a reference estimate based on age and sex alone. Furthermore, analysis of most predictive features highlights the role of events such as chronic inflammatory conditions and specific medications on overall PDAC risk. Our work provides an AI-driven identification of high-risk individuals, with a potential to improve early detection, enhance patient care, and reduce healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.