Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963716›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2025

Macrophage Polarization Profiling in Dynamic Culture System.

Alperen Yılmaz, Resul Özbilgiç, Elifsu Polatlı, İbrahim Halilullah Erbay, Duygu Sağ, Sinan Güven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alperen Yılmaz *Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
Resul Özbilgiç *Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
Elifsu Polatlı *Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
İbrahim Halilullah ErbayIzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
Duygu SağIzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
Sinan GüvenIzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5212-5516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to develop a dynamic on-chip platform to study macrophage polarization in a more physiologically relevant way by incorporating mechanical forces which have been recently shown to play important roles in macrophage biology. Methods: We developed polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) based platform. We examined the effects of the dynamic microenvironment on polarization states of human monocyte derived macrophages (HMDMs) towards the M1 and M2a phenotypes using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) respectively for both static and dynamic conditions. M1 and M2 polarization levels were assessed by qPCR and flow cytometry analyses. Results: M1 and M2 polarization was achieved successfully under dynamic and static conditions. Our platform establishes that the mechanotransductive stimulation through shear stress during polarization has direct synergistic effects with stimulants on TNF-α secretion within HMDMs. Exposure to media flow rates of 0.5, 2.5, and 5 µl/min without stimulants is insufficient to induce macrophage polarization. Conclusion: The dynamic environment present inside our dynamic on-chip culture platform influences the human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDMs) to become polarized into M1 phenotype at a greater level. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-025-00863-0.

Indexed as

Dynamic cultureHuman macrophagesMacrophage polarizationShear stress

Identifiers

PMID40963716
PMCPMC12436668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.