ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Neurophysiological insights into sit-to-stand post stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke often results in the loss of ability to stand-up independently or to perform the transfer with compensatory movement patterns. While neurological disorders are associated with sit-to-stand disability, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the movement and the impact of injury at brain level remain poorly understood. Methods: Stroke participants ( Results: Kinematic data confirms post-stroke participants take significantly longer to complete a sit-to-stand transfer compared to healthy controls but maintain the same kinematic movement phases and temporal muscle activation patterns. EMG data indicates stroke survivors stand up using largely the same temporal muscle activation patterns, however they exhibit delayed peak activity of the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris compared to healthy controls. EEG data reveal stroke survivors demonstrate variable event-related spectral perturbation patterns and reduced event-related synchronization/de-synchronization in the alpha and beta frequency bands and increased asymmetry between brain hemispheres when compared to healthy controls. Conclusion: EMG data supports the wider literature that confirms stroke survivors stand up using the same temporal muscle activation patterns compared to healthy controls, however peak activity of the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris are delayed. EEG data add new knowledge to our understanding of the central control of sit-to-stand transfers in a stroke population, highlighting differences in cortical activity from healthy controls, notably in ERSP patterns during sit to stand phases and in brain hemisphere asymmetry. Findings have relevance as a potential biomarker for stroke functional recovery and indicate that BCI-based applications of sit to stand may need to be trained individually in stroke survivors as they demonstrate variable cortical activation patterns compared to healthy controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.