Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Allelopathic effects of

Suliman M S Alghanem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Suliman M S AlghanemDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Qassim University, Burydah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Allelopathy offers a promising ecological approach to sustainable weed and crop management, yet the allelopathic potential of many underutilized wild species remains unexplored. Methods: The chemical constituents of Results and Discussion: GC-MS analysis revealed 40 compounds, including sesquiterpenes, phytol, patchouli alcohol, and α-cadinol. LL treatments significantly reduced shoot and root growth, pigment content, and biomass in a dose-dependent manner, with rapeseed and mung bean showing the greatest sensitivity. Conversely, LL exposure elevated phenolic and flavonoid levels, antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, CAT), and oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂ and MDA). Correlation analysis demonstrated strong negative relationships between growth traits and oxidative damage, and positive associations between phenolic accumulation and antioxidant responses.

Indexed as

Aizoon canarienseallelopathyantioxidant enzymesleaf leachateoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID40963821
PMCPMC12436394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.