Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964016›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

"Now I have to act on that": Parent anticipation of a therapeutic odyssey following predictive testing for autism.

Katherine E MacDuffie, Aurora M Washington, Catherine A Burrows, Stephen R Dager, Jed T Elison, Annette M Estes, Rebecca Grzadzinski, Chimei M Lee, Joseph Piven, Mark D Shen and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katherine E MacDuffieSeattle Children's Research Institute.
Aurora M WashingtonDrake University.
Catherine A BurrowsUniversity of Minnesota.
Stephen R DagerUniversity of Washington.
Jed T ElisonUniversity of Minnesota.
Annette M EstesUniversity of Washington.
Rebecca GrzadzinskiUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Chimei M LeeUniversity of Minnesota.
Joseph PivenUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Mark D ShenUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Benjamin S WilfondSeattle Children's Research Institute.
Jason WolffUniversity of Minnesota.
Lonnie ZwaigenbaumUniversity of Alberta.
John R PruettWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

Funding

Cellular and molecular mechanisms governing cortical surface area overgrowth in iPSC-derived neural cells from longitudinally characterized individuals with autismR01HD055741 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph Piven · 2007 to 2026
$52.6M
MRI-Based Presymptomatic Prediction of ASD, and Early Infant to School-Age Brain-Behavior Trajectories, Mechanisms, and Related OutcomesR01MH118362 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI John R Pruett · 2019 to 2026
$16.3M
Neuroethics of Predictive MRI Testing: Parental Attitudes Towards Pre-Symptomatic Identification of Autism Spectrum DisorderF32MH118689 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACDUFFIE, KATE E. · 2018 to 2019
$130k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055741NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH118689NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain-based tools are being developed to identify infants at ultra-high likelihood for developing autism and enable presymptomatic intervention, though such interventions are not yet clinically available. Given persistent challenges in accessing autism services, we sought to understand how families might use early predictive results to seek support. Methods: We analyzed 55 interviews with parents of infants aged 6-13 months; one group had experience parenting an older autistic child (n = 30), the other had no prior autism parenting experience (n = 25). All parents were asked what steps they would take if told their infant was likely to develop autism. Results: Both groups described an intent to find appropriate services; parents with prior autism experience provided more specifics based on prior knowledge. The groups diverged in their anticipated supports and information sources. Parents with autism experience anticipated seeking financial support via insurance and disability benefits; those without autism experience reported they would consult their pediatrician for information or search online. Limitations: This qualitative study was conducted with a sample of parents selected for their specific life experiences, but likely does not capture the full range of potential responses to biomarker testing in infancy. Conclusions: Given that most services and benefits require a formal diagnosis, families receiving predictive results in infancy will likely face challenges finding appropriate services. Prior to implementing predictive testing in the first year of life, researchers should consider their obligation to support families who receive predictive results.

Indexed as

autismbioethicsbiomarkerearly interventioninfancypredictionqualitative researchsusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID40964016
PMCPMC12440083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.