ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Phytonutrients and their neuroprotective role in brain disorders.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Association Between Nut Consumption and Risk of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Dietary Polyphenols (Flavonoids) Derived from Plants for Use in Therapeutic Health: Antioxidant Performance, ROS, Molecular Mechanisms, and Bioavailability Limitations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring the Neuroprotective Properties of Capsanthin: Antioxidant Defense and Inflammatory Responses.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Extraction process and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of total flavonoids from Broussonetia papyrifera leaves.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, cognitive impairment is a significant health problem. Function is substantially impaired by a number of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinsonism, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease and other types of cognitive impairment, cerebrovascular disabilities, seizure-related disorders, and brain traumas. Over time, a number of chemical messengers and signaling molecules have been identified as potential targets for treatment, and tests have been performed against these targets using both conventional and novel chemicals. Phytochemicals derived from medicinal plants are essential for preserving the chemical balance of the central nervous system because they change the activity of major inhibitory receptors that receive neurotransmitters. Many herbs have been used in conventional medicine to treat cognitive problems. Although the presence of receptors that are responsible or transporters for compounds called polyphenols and other phytochemicals in brain regions remains to be determined, multiple target substances seem to be a promising class of treatment options for treating disorders with multifactorial origins. Additional studies suggest that flavonoids possess significant anti-inflammatory properties in the brain, making them a promising therapeutic option for conditions such as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, as well as chronic neuroinflammatory disorders like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. This review highlights how phytochemicals contribute to the protection against brain disorders and explores the underlying mechanisms involved in their action. It also emphasizes the core biological processes, providing deeper insight into the therapeutic potential of phytochemicals in the treatment of neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.