Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964142›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Artificial intelligence in ADHD assessment: a comprehensive review of research progress from early screening to precise differential diagnosis.

Cuijie Zhao, Yan Xu, Ruixing Li, Huawei Li, Meng Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cuijie ZhaoPediatrics Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yan XuPediatrics Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ruixing LiPediatrics Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Huawei LiPediatrics Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Meng ZhangPediatrics Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis traditionally relies on subjective assessments, which lead to challenges like symptom overlap, heterogeneity, and misdiagnosis risk. Artificial intelligence (AI), especially machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offers objective assessment opportunities by processing complex multimodal data (behavioral, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, genetic). This paper reviews AI's current applications in objective ADHD assessment, covering early screening, risk prediction, diagnostic assistance, classification, assistance in precise differential diagnosis, symptom quantification, and heterogeneous subtype identification. While AI models show significant potential in extracting objective biomarkers and improving assessment efficiency, the field faces challenges: insufficient standardized data, limited generalization, interpretability issues, potential biases, and lack of rigorous clinical validation. Future research must establish large-scale, standardized multimodal databases, develop robust, interpretable, and fair AI models, and conduct rigorous clinical translation validation to achieve responsible, precise, objective, and personalized ADHD assessment and management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)biomarkersdifferential diagnosismachine learning (ML)neuroimagingobjective assessment

Identifiers

PMID40964142
PMCPMC12436382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.