ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Mechanisms of Neural Representation and Segregation of Multiple Spatially Separated Visual Stimuli.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segregating objects from one another and the background is essential for scene understanding, object recognition, and visually guided action. In natural scenes, it is common to encounter spatially separated stimuli, such as distinct figure-ground regions, adjacent objects, and partial occlusions. Neurons in mid- and high-level visual cortex have large receptive fields (RFs) that often encompass multiple, spatially separated stimuli. It is unclear how neurons represent and segregate multiple stimuli within their RFs, and the role of spatial cues for such representation. To investigate these questions, we recorded neuronal responses in the middle temporal (MT) cortex of monkeys to spatially separated stimuli that moved simultaneously in two directions. We found that, across motion directions, response tuning to multiple stimuli was systematically biased toward the stimulus located at the more-preferred RF subregion of the neuron. The sign and magnitude of this spatial-location bias were correlated with the spatial preference of the neuron for single stimuli presented in isolation. We demonstrated that neuronal responses to multiple stimuli can be captured by an extended normalization model, which is a sum of the responses elicited by individual stimuli weighted by the spatial preference of the neuron. We also proposed a circuit implementation for the model. Our results indicate that visual neurons leverage spatial selectivity within their RFs to represent multiple spatially separated stimuli. The spatial-location bias in neuronal responses enables individual components of multiple stimuli to be represented by a population of neurons with different spatial preferences, providing a neural substrate for segregating multiple stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.