ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Point-of-care ultrasound in the evaluation of STEMI patients.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Congestion in Heart Failure from Volume Overload to Venous Pressure and Organ Disfunction with VExUS.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Early risk stratification and detection of complications are critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a valuable bedside tool in the acute evaluation of STEMI patients. Objectives: To explore the role of POCUS in the early assessment of STEMI patients, focusing on its diagnostic and prognostic utility. Methods: A comprehensive review of current literature was conducted, examining the application of POCUS in STEMI. Results: Lung ultrasound (LUS) enables rapid detection of pulmonary congestion through the identification of B-lines, offering superior sensitivity compared to traditional methods. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) provides a quantitative assessment of stroke volume and cardiac output, aiding in the identification of low-flow states. Integrating these modalities enhances hemodynamic evaluation. Moreover, a systematic POCUS assessment may facilitate early detection of high-risk patients with acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock, as well as the identification of mechanical complications. Conclusions: The incorporation of POCUS, specifically LUS and LVOT-VTI, into the early evaluation of STEMI patients enhances diagnostic accuracy and prognostic assessment. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols and evaluating the impact of POCUS-guided management on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.