Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964623›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2025

Simultaneous inference for generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders.

Jin-Hong Du, Larry Wasserman, Kathryn Roeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Causal Inference for Genomic Data with Multiple Heterogeneous Outcomes.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin-Hong DuDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Larry WassermanDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Kathryn RoederDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Methods for single-cell CRISPR screens and multiomic data: constructing powerful well-calibrated tests, circumventing unmeasured confounding, and accounting for denoising and imputationR01MH123184 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KATHRYN M ROEDER · 2020 to 2026
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tens of thousands of simultaneous hypothesis tests are routinely performed in genomic studies to identify differentially expressed genes. However, due to unmeasured confounders, many standard statistical approaches may be substantially biased. This paper investigates the large-scale hypothesis testing problem for multivariate generalized linear models in the presence of confounding effects. Under arbitrary confounding mechanisms, we propose a unified statistical estimation and inference framework that harnesses orthogonal structures and integrates linear projections into three key stages. It begins by disentangling marginal and uncorrelated confounding effects to recover the latent coefficients. Subsequently, latent factors and primary effects are jointly estimated through lasso-type optimization. Finally, we incorporate projected and weighted bias-correction steps for hypothesis testing. Theoretically, we establish the identification conditions of various effects and non-asymptotic error bounds. We show effective Type-I error control of asymptotic

Indexed as

Hidden variablesHigh-dimensional regressionHypothesis testingMultivariate response regressionNuisance parametersSurrogate variables analysis

Identifiers

PMID40964623
PMCPMC12439847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.