Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964721›Full record

ArticleArchives of insect biochemistry and physiology2025

Converging XGboost Machine Learning and Molecular Docking Strategies to Identify Attractants for Ceratitis capitata: Molecular Characterization and Database Curation of Natural Ligands for In Vitro/In Vivo Tests.

E B Alencar Filho, R P Guimarães, V C Santos, A B P Bispo, B A G Paranhos, N C Aquino, R Nascimento, R F Oliveira Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E B Alencar FilhoLaboratory of Molecular Modelling Applied to Pharmacy (LAMMAF)-Graduate Program in Biosciences; Graduate Program in Health and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-0114
R P GuimarãesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
V C SantosDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
A B P BispoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
B A G ParanhosLaboratory of Biological Control, Embrapa Semiárido, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
N C AquinoChemical Ecology Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
R NascimentoChemical Ecology Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
R F Oliveira NetoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Juazeiro, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5539

Funding

This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Centro Nacional de Processamento de Alto Desempenho da UFC (CENAPAD-UFC); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE-APQ-0069-1.06/25).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is one of the most critical agricultural pests, causing economic damage globally due to its wide range of fruit hosts. Conventional insecticides have brought environmental, human health, and resistance challenges, driving interest in semiochemicals as sustainable pest management alternatives. Potential molecular attractants can be assessed experimentally through methods such as electroantennography (EAG) or behavioral assays. Odorant Binding Proteins (OBPs) have been recognized as crucial mediators in detecting these chemical signals. Although isolated compounds can provide mechanistic insights, volatile blends more accurately reflect natural conditions and typically elicit stronger behavioral responses. However, designing effective blends is challenging due to their complexity and regulatory limitations. Therefore, curated molecular databases of potential attractants become essential to accelerate the discovery and reduce cost in research programs, both in vitro and in vivo tests. The in silico molecular approaches, including Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics (MD) and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR), offer cost-effective methods to prioritize candidates and/or understand ligand-OBP interactions. In this study, computational methodologies including Machine Learning (ML) based QSAR, molecular docking and MD simulations were integrated to highlight molecular features of standard molecules and identify potential attractors for C. capitata, which are expected to be good OBP binders. Initially, was applied a Bee Colony Algorithm, combined with an final XGBoost Machine Learning model, enabled the identification of five essential molecular descriptors to explain the attractant effect of 20 standard compounds recognized in the literature. Applying this model to an online database of natural products from Brazil (NuBBE-Nuclei of Bioassays, Ecophysiology and Biosynthesis of Natural Products Database), 206 molecules were identified from over 2000 candidates. In a parallel front of investigation, docking-based virtual screening was performed using the same NuBBE database. Most promissory compounds were discussed based on binding energy, structure/geometry focusing on interactions and estimated volatility, through the evaluation of vapor pressure. MD simulations with the gold standard compound (E,E)-α-farnesene provided insights into ligand-protein interactions. Interestingly, 16 of the top 20 ranked compounds after dockings were predicted as attractors by the XGBoost model. Finally, the curated database of 206 compounds, the great contribution of this paper (beyond the model), can be used to assertively select molecules for experimental tests of future blends or isolated compounds.

Indexed as

Ceratitis capitataMachine LearningMolecular Docking SimulationPheromonesReceptors, OdorantAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsInsect ProteinsLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationshipinsect attractantsInsect ProteinsLigandsodorant-binding proteinPheromonesReceptors, OdorantCeratitis capitataligand and structure‐based virtual screeningmachine learningodorant binding proteinssemiochemicals

Identifiers

PMID40964721
PMCPMC12444618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.