Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964989›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2025

3D Bioprinting and Artificial Intelligence for Tumor Microenvironment Modeling: A Scoping Review of Models, Methods, and Integration Pathways.

Urszula Piotrowska, James Tsoi, Pradeep Singh, Avijit Banerjee, Marcin Sobczak

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Urszula PiotrowskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Biomaterials, Medical University of Warsaw, 1 Banacha Str., 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-9528
James TsoiDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0698-7155
Pradeep SinghDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.
Avijit BanerjeeCentre of Oral Clinical Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0091-7348
Marcin SobczakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Biomaterials, Medical University of Warsaw, 1 Banacha Str., 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in cancer research emphasize the development of physiologically relevant models to better understand tumor behavior and therapeutic responses. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in tumor progression, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting offers unique capabilities for constructing complex in vitro tumor models that closely replicate the TME heterogeneity and interactions. These biomimetic models surpass the limitations of traditional 2D cultures and reduce the reliance on animal testing. This review aimed to systematically map current research on 3D bioprinting and artificial intelligence (AI) applications in modeling TME across selected cancer types. The review was structured into three thematic domains: 3D bioprinting of TME models for selected cancer types, AI applications in 3D bioprinting regardless of clinical focus, and integration of AI with 3D bioprinting specifically for TME modeling. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, covering publications from January 2020 to June 2025. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines and focused on peer-reviewed original research articles published in English. Included cancer types were colorectal cancer, oral cancer, breast cancer, and glioma. In total, 63 articles were screened for TME-specific 3D bioprinting, with 44 included. For AI applications in 3D bioprinting irrespective of cancer type, 67 records were identified and 14 met the inclusion criteria. Only one study explicitly integrated AI and 3D bioprinting for TME modeling, highlighting a critical research gap. These findings are illustrated in the PRISMA flowcharts for clarity. Despite growing interest in both 3D bioprinting and AI, their combined application for modeling of the tumor microenvironment remains limited. The reviewed literature demonstrates significant progress in bioink development, process optimization, and quality control through AI methods. However, further interdisciplinary research is necessary to realize the potential of AI in enhancing TME modeling for oncology applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBioprintingNeoplasmsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansModels, Biological3D bioprintingartificial intelligencebreast cancercolorectal cancer, oral cancerglioma cancermachine learning, deep learningtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40964989
PMCPMC12505267

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.