ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2025
3D Bioprinting and Artificial Intelligence for Tumor Microenvironment Modeling: A Scoping Review of Models, Methods, and Integration Pathways.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Experimental Models and Nanotechnology-Based Platforms in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Tumor Biology to Translational Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Rapid Fabrication of Biomimetic Perfusable Structures via Lift-Up Viscous Fingering.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Spatial architecture and dynamic surveillance: 3D bioprinting and microfluidics converge to overcome digestive malignancies.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- From Technological Innovation to Clinical Translation: Progress and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting for the Development of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-enabled multimodal therapy for endometrial cancer: Subtype-guided immuno-metabolic modulation and fertility-conscious regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- 3D Bioprinting for Tumor Microenvironment Reconstruction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence empowered biomaterials for cancer therapy: From rational design to clinical translation.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Modeling of Biomechanical and Functional Parameters of Hydrogel-Cell Composites Fabricated by 3D Bioprinting Using AI-Supported Approach.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tumor-on-chip's alliance with molecular pathology against metastatic disease.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Nanomedicine: Monitoring and Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment for Precision Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted smart hydrogel bioinks in 3D bioprinting: design, optimization, and construct validation for functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Chitosan-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Targeted Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Scoping Review.Marine drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in cancer research emphasize the development of physiologically relevant models to better understand tumor behavior and therapeutic responses. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in tumor progression, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting offers unique capabilities for constructing complex in vitro tumor models that closely replicate the TME heterogeneity and interactions. These biomimetic models surpass the limitations of traditional 2D cultures and reduce the reliance on animal testing. This review aimed to systematically map current research on 3D bioprinting and artificial intelligence (AI) applications in modeling TME across selected cancer types. The review was structured into three thematic domains: 3D bioprinting of TME models for selected cancer types, AI applications in 3D bioprinting regardless of clinical focus, and integration of AI with 3D bioprinting specifically for TME modeling. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, covering publications from January 2020 to June 2025. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines and focused on peer-reviewed original research articles published in English. Included cancer types were colorectal cancer, oral cancer, breast cancer, and glioma. In total, 63 articles were screened for TME-specific 3D bioprinting, with 44 included. For AI applications in 3D bioprinting irrespective of cancer type, 67 records were identified and 14 met the inclusion criteria. Only one study explicitly integrated AI and 3D bioprinting for TME modeling, highlighting a critical research gap. These findings are illustrated in the PRISMA flowcharts for clarity. Despite growing interest in both 3D bioprinting and AI, their combined application for modeling of the tumor microenvironment remains limited. The reviewed literature demonstrates significant progress in bioink development, process optimization, and quality control through AI methods. However, further interdisciplinary research is necessary to realize the potential of AI in enhancing TME modeling for oncology applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.