SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Which antiplatelet is better after stents? A meta-analysis of aspirin vs clopidogrel in the maintenance phase.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electroacupuncture for slow flow/no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global mortality and disability, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being a prevalent treatment. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) is a standard approach post-PCI. However, the optimal choice between aspirin and clopidogrel during SAPT, especially for high risk of bleeding patients, remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy in CAD patients after PCI. A comprehensive literature search identified 11 studies (seven RCTs and four cohorts) involving 26,324 patients, with 11,435 on clopidogrel and 14,889 on aspirin. Our analysis found that clopidogrel was significantly associated with no significant difference regarding major bleeding compared to aspirin; however, after sensitivity analysis, clopidogrel monotherapy resulted in statistically significant 36% and 25% reduction, respectively. The findings suggest that clopidogrel monotherapy is not inferior to aspirin monotherapy, warranting its consideration in long-term SAPT post-PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965656What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.