Trial reportDiabetologia2025
Repeated faecal microbiota transplantation for individuals with type 1 diabetes and gastroenteropathy.
Trial report in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04749030 (Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 and Severe Gastrointestinal Neuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 and Severe Gastrointestinal Neuropathy: a Randomised, Double-blinded Safety and Pilot-efficacy Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus and gut microbiota: from microbiome characteristics to prevention and treatment strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisFaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with diabetic gastroenteropathy, as demonstrated in a recent placebo-controlled trial. In most participants, symptom relief was transient, raising the need for repeated treatments. This study assessed the long-term efficacy, safety and feasibility of repeated, on-demand FMT as a maintenance treatment in this patient population.
methodsAll 20 participants from the randomised clinical trial were offered extended open-label treatment with FMT. Symptom assessments were conducted by telephone every 2-3 months using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (GSRS-IBS). Secondary measures included bowel movement frequency, stool consistency assessed using the Bristol Stool Scale, perceived treatment benefit on a seven-point Likert scale, and adverse events (AEs). FMT was primarily given as oral capsules, and colonoscopy was used for participants who could not swallow capsules.
resultsOf the original 20 participants, 17 were included in the present study and followed from September 2021 to December 2024, with a median Duration of follow-up of 33.2 months (range 14.7-39.1 months). Participants received a total of 95 FMT treatments, with a median of five per participant and a median interval of 5.3 months between treatments. FMT induced consistent symptom relief, with reduced GSRS-IBS scores across multiple treatments. At the last FMT treatment provided, the mean GSRS-IBS score had decreased from 60 (95% CI 54, 66) at baseline to 35 (95% CI 29, 40), with a mean difference of -25 (95% CI -18, -33). The occurrence of frequent bowel movements 2 weeks after treatment (> 7 per day) decreased from 19% (95% CI 10%, 28%) to 3% (95% CI 0%, 7%). Stool consistency improved after treatment, and the frequency of normal stool types (Bristol Stool Scale score 3-5) increased from 28% (95% CI 18%, 39%) to 76% (95% CI 66%, 86%). Participant satisfaction was high, with 86% reporting considerable benefits (Likert scores 5-7). Repeated FMT was generally well tolerated, with most AEs being mild and self-limiting. Fifteen serious AEs were documented, of which only one was deemed to be possibly related to FMT. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationRepeated, on-demand FMT is effective and safe for long-term treatment of individuals with type 1 diabetes and severe diabetic gastroenteropathy.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04749030
fundingThe study was funded by a Steno Collaborative Grant (no. 0058906).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.