Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40967670›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025

Feasibility of semiautomated surveillance of healthcare-associated

Lyn-Li Lim, Stephanie K Tanamas, Ann Bull, Daniel Capurro, Kylie Snook, Vivian K Y Leung, N Deborah Friedman, Caroline Marshall, Roland Laguitan, Judy Brett and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lyn-Li LimInfectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia lynli.lim@mh.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1782-7875
Stephanie K TanamasVICNISS, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-2811
Ann BullVICNISS, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel CapurroCentre for the Digital Transformation of Health and Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kylie SnookVICNISS, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vivian K Y LeungInfectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
N Deborah FriedmanInfectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Caroline MarshallThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roland LaguitanVICNISS, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Judy BrettVICNISS, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Leon J WorthVICNISS, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany hospitals struggle to transform electronic health record (EHR) data to support performance, continuous improvement and patient safety. Our study aimed to explore the feasibility of semiautomated surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in Australian hospitals, focussing on

methodNational surveillance case definitions were reviewed with an inventory list of data elements created to identify high-probability healthcare-associated SABSI events. An interview schedule was developed to assess the availability, characteristics and quality of EHR data for data elements. Interviews were conducted with hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) staff.

results12 IPC staff representing 12 hospitals and 11 healthcare organisations were interviewed. EHRs were in place at nine (75%) sites, supplied by six different vendors. Heterogeneity was observed in EHR functionalities, data capture methods for routine care and local approaches to use electronic systems to reduce HAI surveillance workload. None reported using automated surveillance systems. Most core data elements for the SABSI algorithm were present in EHRs, suggesting only minor modification to the SABSI definitions may be needed for automation, but issues with data quality were also described. DISCUSSION: We propose that modification of the national SABSI definitions is needed for automation. While many Victorian hospitals have adopted EHRs, data quality and interoperability issues limit the leveraging of EHR data for secondary purposes.

conclusionsWe have taken the initial steps of evaluating the feasibility of semiautomated HAI surveillance in Victorian hospitals. With further development, this offers the promise of enhanced efficiency and reduced human resources required for HAI surveillance.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCross InfectionElectronic Health RecordsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusFeasibility StudiesHumansVictoriaDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsHospitals

Identifiers

PMID40967670
PMCPMC12458672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.