ArticleAsian spine journal2025
Risk factors for screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Effect of High Pelvic Incidence on Fixation Failure in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A preliminary feasibility study of a tough hydrogel as a nucleus pulposus substitute for degenerative disc disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Screw loosening (SL) is a common complication following lumbar interbody fusion (LIF), particularly for degenerative lumbar disease. This study investigated the risk factors for SL following LIF for degenerative lumbar disease and examined the clinical relevance of SL. A PROSPERO-registered systematic search was conducted in the ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane databases to identify longitudinal studies up to October 2024. Degenerative lumbar diseases included stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and disc herniation. Assessed risk factors were Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, screw length, fixation to the sacrum, fused levels, and Hounsfield units (HU). Twenty-two studies involving 3,689 participants (56%±5% female; mean age, 61.95±9.55 years) and 17,722 lumbar screws were analyzed. Overall, 10%±2% of screws exhibited loosening in 29%±5% of patients, with 5%±2% undergoing revision surgery. Patients with SL (SL group) and those without SL (non-SL group) had similar sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. The SL group had higher Visual Analog Scale scores for back pain (mean difference [MD], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-1.07; p<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (MD, 3.34; 95% CI, 0.49-6.20; p=0.02), indicating the clinical relevance of SL. The SL group exhibited significantly higher Cobb angle (MD, 2.42; 95% CI, 0.36-4.49; p=0.02), lower LL angle (MD, -3.67; 95% CI, -6.33 to -1.01; p=0.01), and shorter screw length (MD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.78 to -0.45; p=0.01). Fixation to the sacrum, increased fused levels, and decreased HU were significant risk factors. The area under the curve for HU was 0.80 (0.77-0.84), with a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.67-0.81) and specificity of 0.76 (0.66-0.84), underscoring notable prognostic value. Patients with SL exhibited higher Cobb angles, lower LL angles, and shorter screws. Fixation to sacrum, increased fused levels, and decreased HU were significant risk factors for SL (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024563780).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.