ArticleRenal failure2025
Outcomes of single kidney transplantation from small pediatric donors aged <5 years: comparative analysis between pediatric and adult recipients.
Article in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes and learning curve of single-kidney transplantation from small pediatric donors in children: a retrospective cohort study with meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant Recipients From Pediatric Donors Have Comparable Outcomes to Those From Adult Donors, Regardless of the Type of Donation.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Challenges and outcomes in pediatric and adult kidney transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of kidneys from small pediatric donors (< 5 years) for single kidney transplantation (SKT) may expand the donor pool. In recent years, many national allocation policies have given priority to pediatric recipients. However, comparative studies involving pediatric and adult recipients of single kidney transplants from small pediatric donors are limited. All patients who underwent SKT from small pediatric donors aged < 5 years at our center between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2024 were included in this study. The outcomes included graft survival, patient survival, and post-transplant complications, which were compared between pediatric and adult recipients. The patient cohort included 83 adult recipients and 55 pediatric recipients from 48 and 40 small pediatric donors (aged < 5 years), respectively. Three-year death-censored graft survival and patient survival in pediatric recipients were 81.7% and 100%, respectively, which were not significantly different from those in adult recipients (89.0% and 95.8%). The leading cause of graft loss was vascular thrombosis (6 cases), followed by rejection (5 cases). No significant differences were observed between pediatric and adult recipients regarding primary nonfunction, the incidence of proteinuria, vascular and urinary complications, or the cumulative incidence of acute rejection. However, adult recipients experienced a significantly higher incidence of delayed graft function than pediatric recipients. SKT from small pediatric donors achieved comparable outcomes in adult and pediatric recipients, validating that current policies prioritizing pediatric recipients are clinically appropriate. Addressing risks of vascular thrombosis and rejection may further improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.