ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Recent Advancements in Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction from a Compressive Measurement.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperspectral imaging-based early stress and disease detection for sustainable crop management.Planta · 2026Review
- View-Aligned Nonlocal Low-Rank Tensor Reconstruction for Snapshot Compressive Multi-View Spectral Imaging System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Optical Metrology and Perception Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- SBCS-Net: Sparse Bayesian and Deep Learning Framework for Compressed Sensing in Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperspectral (HS) image reconstruction has become a pivotal research area in computational imaging, facilitating the recovery of high-resolution spectral information from compressive snapshot measurements. With the rapid advancement of deep neural networks, reconstruction techniques have achieved significant improvements in both accuracy and computational efficiency, enabling more precise spectral recovery across a wide range of applications. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent progress in HS image reconstruction, systematically categorized into three main paradigms: traditional model-based methods, deep learning-based approaches, and hybrid frameworks that integrate data-driven priors with the mathematical modeling of the degradation process. We examine the foundational principles, strengths, and limitations of each category, with particular attention to developments such as sparsity and low-rank priors in model-based methods, the evolution from convolutional neural networks to Transformer architectures in learning-based approaches, and deep unfolding strategies in hybrid models. Furthermore, we review benchmark datasets, evaluation metrics, and prevailing challenges including spectral distortion, computational cost, and generalizability across diverse conditions. Finally, we outline potential research directions to address current limitations. This survey aims to provide a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners striving to advance the field of HS image reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.