Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968829›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Recent Advancements in Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction from a Compressive Measurement.

Xian-Hua Han, Jian Wang, Huiyan Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xian-Hua HanGraduate School of Artificial Intelligence and Science, Rikkyo University, Tokyo 171-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5003-3180
Jian WangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, ShanDong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.
Huiyan JiangSoftware College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperspectral (HS) image reconstruction has become a pivotal research area in computational imaging, facilitating the recovery of high-resolution spectral information from compressive snapshot measurements. With the rapid advancement of deep neural networks, reconstruction techniques have achieved significant improvements in both accuracy and computational efficiency, enabling more precise spectral recovery across a wide range of applications. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent progress in HS image reconstruction, systematically categorized into three main paradigms: traditional model-based methods, deep learning-based approaches, and hybrid frameworks that integrate data-driven priors with the mathematical modeling of the degradation process. We examine the foundational principles, strengths, and limitations of each category, with particular attention to developments such as sparsity and low-rank priors in model-based methods, the evolution from convolutional neural networks to Transformer architectures in learning-based approaches, and deep unfolding strategies in hybrid models. Furthermore, we review benchmark datasets, evaluation metrics, and prevailing challenges including spectral distortion, computational cost, and generalizability across diverse conditions. Finally, we outline potential research directions to address current limitations. This survey aims to provide a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners striving to advance the field of HS image reconstruction.

Indexed as

degardationhyperspectral image reconstructionlong-dependencyMLP networksensing maskspatial–spectral modelling

Identifiers

PMID40968829
PMCPMC12158250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.