ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of Electrodermal Signal Features as Indicators of Cognitive and Emotional Reactions-Comparison of the Effectiveness of Selected Statistical Measures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates which statistical measures of electrodermal activity (EDA) signal features most effectively differentiate between responses to stimuli and resting states in participants performing tasks with varying cognitive and emotional reactions. The study involved 30 healthy participants. Collected EDA data were statistically analyzed, comparing the effectiveness of twelve statistical signal measures in detecting stimulus-induced changes. The aim of this study is to answer the following research question: Which statistical features of the electrodermal activity signal most effectively indicate changes induced by cognitive and emotional reactions, and are there such significant similarities (high correlations) among these features that some of them can be considered redundant? The results indicated that amplitude-related measures-mean, median, maximum, and minimum-were most effective. It was also found that some signal features were highly correlated, suggesting the possibility of simplifying the analysis by choosing just one measure from each correlated pair. The results indicate that stronger emotional stimuli lead to more pronounced changes in EDA than stimuli with a low emotional load. These findings may contribute to the standardization of EDA analysis in future research on cognitive and emotional reaction engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.