Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968893›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of Electrodermal Signal Features as Indicators of Cognitive and Emotional Reactions-Comparison of the Effectiveness of Selected Statistical Measures.

Marcin Jukiewicz, Joanna Marcinkowska

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcin JukiewiczFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-712 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9404-9814
Joanna MarcinkowskaFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-712 Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates which statistical measures of electrodermal activity (EDA) signal features most effectively differentiate between responses to stimuli and resting states in participants performing tasks with varying cognitive and emotional reactions. The study involved 30 healthy participants. Collected EDA data were statistically analyzed, comparing the effectiveness of twelve statistical signal measures in detecting stimulus-induced changes. The aim of this study is to answer the following research question: Which statistical features of the electrodermal activity signal most effectively indicate changes induced by cognitive and emotional reactions, and are there such significant similarities (high correlations) among these features that some of them can be considered redundant? The results indicated that amplitude-related measures-mean, median, maximum, and minimum-were most effective. It was also found that some signal features were highly correlated, suggesting the possibility of simplifying the analysis by choosing just one measure from each correlated pair. The results indicate that stronger emotional stimuli lead to more pronounced changes in EDA than stimuli with a low emotional load. These findings may contribute to the standardization of EDA analysis in future research on cognitive and emotional reaction engagement.

Indexed as

CognitionEmotionsGalvanic Skin ResponseAdultFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung Adultcognitive reactionelectrodermal activityemotional reactionpsychophysiologysignal analysissignal processing

Identifiers

PMID40968893
PMCPMC12157915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.