Evidence mapPaperPMID 40969179Full record

ReviewInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

Artificial intelligence: Revolutionizing pediatric emergency care - A narrative review.

Ayonna Saha, Anushruti Shukla, Vikram Bhaskar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayonna SahaDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Anushruti ShuklaDepartment of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India.
Vikram BhaskarDepartment of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to machines capable of imitating human cognition, with abilities to learn, apply logic and reasoning, and adapt to new information. The scope of AI in medicine ranges from prehospital triage to assisting in diagnosis and prognosticating patients. AI has shown incredible potential in pediatric emergency department by focusing on the development of clinical prediction models, triage systems, and diagnostic aids, contributing to higher accuracy and efficiency in patient management, along with hospital management, medical education, and training. Our review article discusses the current applications of AI in pediatric emergency and explores the barriers to AI in health care and ways to circumnavigate them moving forward. We aim to offer an insight into this less-explored world where technology meets the unpredictable and fast-paced environment of pediatric emergency medicine, building a future with a promise of innovation and redefining standards of care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceclinical predictionmachine learningpediatric emergencytriage

Identifiers

PMID40969179
PMCPMC12443456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.