ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
Automated Skin Cancer Report Generation via a Knowledge-Distilled Vision-Language Model.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI)'s capacity to analyze dermoscopic images promises a groundbreaking leap in skin cancer diagnostics, offering exceptional accuracy and an effortlessly non-invasive image acquisition process. However, this immense potential, which has ignited widespread research enthusiasm, is critically undermined due to the lack of transparency and interpretability. The automated generation of articulate and comprehensive diagnostic reports will bridge this critical gap by not only illuminate the AI's diagnostic rational but also substantially reduce the demanding workload of the medical professionals. This study presents a multimodal vision-language model (VLM) trained using a two-stage knowledge distillation (KD) framework to generate structured medical reports from dermoscopic images, with descriptive features based on the 7-point melanoma checklist. The reports are organized into clinically relevant sections-Findings, Impression, and Differential Diagnosis-aligned with dermatological standards. Experimental evaluation demonstrates the system's ability to produce accurate and interpretable reports. Human feedback from a medical professional, assessing clinical relevance, completeness, and interpretability, supports the utility of the generated reports, while computational metrics validate their accuracy and alignment with reference pseudo-reports, achieving a SacreBLEU score of 55.59, a ROUGE-1 score of 0.5438, a ROUGE-L score of 0.3828, and a BERTScore F1 of 0.9025. These findings underscore the model's ability to generalize effectively to unseen data, enabled by its multimodal design, clinical alignment, and explainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.