ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Association Between Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological Considerations Regarding the Article "Association Between Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan" [Letter].Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, commonly known as Z-drugs, are widely prescribed for conditions such as insomnia, anxiety, and epilepsy. Emerging evidence suggests that these agents may influence auditory function and may be associated with tinnitus, potentially through their modulation of GABAA receptors. However, existing research findings on this association remain inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine the potential association between the use of Z-drugs and the subsequent risk of incident tinnitus. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted using the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. The exposure cohort was composed of all beneficiaries who were prescribed a Z-drug during the study period. The comparison cohort was selected from beneficiaries without any prescription history for Z-drugs during the same timeframe. The primary outcome was the risk of tinnitus within a 5-year follow-up period. To minimize potential confounding, propensity score matching was applied, followed by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing Z-drug users with nonusers. Results: 16,225 patients were identified as Z-drug users, while 1,370,776 were classified as nonusers. Over the 5-year period, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that Z-drug users had a higher risk of developing tinnitus compared to nonusers (adjusted HR: 1.501; 95% CI: 1.423-1.583). After propensity score matching, this association remained significant (adjusted HR: 1.496; 95% CI: 1.377-1.624). Furthermore, a consistent association between Z-drug use and tinnitus was observed across most subgroups. Conclusion: The study suggests that the use of Z-drugs, the most prescribed psychoactive drugs globally, may be associated with an increased risk of developing tinnitus. Limitations include the potential for residual confounding and misclassification inherent to claims-based data. Clinicians should consider this potential association when prescribing Z-drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.