Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969552›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Changes in antioxidant capacity and gut microbiota in mice after intake of camel milk.

Jianwen Wang, Wanlu Ren, Shibo Liu, Zexu Li, Yaqi Zeng, Jun Meng, Xinkui Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianwen WangCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Wanlu RenCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Shibo LiuCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Zexu LiCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Yaqi ZengCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Jun MengCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Xinkui YaoCollege of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fermented camel milk offers significant nutritional benefits, enriched with probiotics that generate bioactive compounds advantageous to human health. In order to investigate the effects of camel milk with different treatments on Antioxidant Capacity and Gut Microbiota in mice, 32 ICR mice were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups, including gavage with 10 mL/kg body weight of distilled water (DW Group), camel milk (CM Group), fermented camel milk (FCM Group), and pasteurized fermented camel milk (PFCM Group) every morning, respectively. After 28 days, liver and colon samples were collected to assess liver antioxidant capacity, and metagenomic analysis was performed on alterations in microbial community structures. Results demonstrated that all camel milk treatments elevated liver total protein levels while reducing MDA and SOD activity. In addition, the PFCM group had the highest total antioxidant capacity and the lowest SOD content. In addition, the intestinal microorganisms of mice changed at the phylum, genus and species levels after being gavaged with camel milk of different treatments. A total of 4732 microorganisms were identified, of which 259, 222, 116 and 164 were unique to the DW, CM, FCM and PFCM groups, respectively. The relative abundances of Adlercreutzia caecimuris, Adlercreutzia mucosicola and Enterorhabdus sp. P55 were significantly higher in the CM, FCM and PFCM groups than in the DW group, and the relative abundances of Parvibacter caecicola, Adlercreutzia muris and Roseburia sp. 1XD42-69 were significantly higher in the CM and PFCM groups than in the DW group. In addition, the relative abundances of Faecalibaculum rodentium, Alistipes muris and Limosilactobacillus reuteri were different between the CM and FCM groups. The results of the correlation analysis between the relative abundance of microbial species and antioxidant indices showed that Adlercreutzia mucosicola, Adlercreutzia muris, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Enterorhabdus sp. P55 were significantly correlated with the antioxidant indices of mice. Further functional annotations indicated that these microorganisms might modulate antioxidant activity via metabolic and organismal systems. In summary, camel milk and fermented camel milk can play a positive role in regulating the intestinal flora of mice, thereby regulating the antioxidant capacity of mice and alleviating the effects of oxidative stress on the body. This study provides a scientific foundation for the further exploration and utilization of camel milk.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMilkAnimalsBacteriaCamelusColonFermentationLiverMaleMetagenomicsMiceMice, Inbred ICRProbioticsAntioxidantsantioxidant capacitycamel milkgut microbiotametagenomicmice

Identifiers

PMID40969552
PMCPMC12440968

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.