ReviewSmart medicine2025
Advancements and Future Perspectives of Microfluidic Technology in Pediatric Healthcare.
Review in Smart medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the ability to precisely control and manipulate fluids at the microscale, microfluidics provides unmatched advantages such as reduced sample size, rapid analysis, and enhanced sensitivity. Microfluidic technology has emerged as a revolutionary approach in pediatric healthcare, offering innovative solutions for diagnostics, monitoring, and treatment. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements and future directions of microfluidic technology in the field of pediatrics. We begin with a brief introduction of several types of microfluidic devices that are more common in the pediatric field. Then, the substantial advances in biomedical applications of microfluidics in pediatric healthcare are explored, encompassing diagnosis, research, and treatment. Finally, challenges and limitations such as material selection, device standardization, stability, and regulatory considerations are also discussed that must be addressed to increase the utilization of microfluidics in the pediatric clinical field. Overall, this review underscores the transformative potential of microfluidics to improve the quality of healthcare and outcomes for pediatric patients, while also highlighting the opportunities for future research and development in this burgeoning field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.