ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Anticipations and Requirements of Individuals with Long-Term Health Conditions Regarding Self-Management and Digital Health Support Tools.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This research examines the individuals with chronic health conditions who desire self-management support, exploring their views towards digital health for self-management purposes. Materials and Methods: The researchers conducted an exploratory qualitative investigation through eight focus groups, allocating two groups to each condition: diabetes (groups of seven and six participants), hypertension (groups of six and six), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (groups of six and five), and cardiovascular conditions (groups of five and five). The discussion focused on three areas: 1) how chronic illness affects everyday living; 2) viewpoints and requirements regarding self-management; and 3) expectations, needs, and readiness to use digital health (eHealth) for self-management. The research employed a content-based analytical approach. Results: The patient groups showed different expectations and needs regarding eHealth and self-management. The diabetes and hypertension groups reported the most needs and perceived benefits, while COPD came next in terms of willingness to use eHealth for self-management. In contrast, cardiovascular patients indicated fewer requirements for self-management support as their condition had a minimal effect on their daily activities. Across all groups, patients favored having the choice to utilize eHealth tools rather than healthcare professionals mandating their use despite the Saudi healthcare system's directive nature. Some participants also saw potential for AI to support self-management, particularly through features like early warnings. Participants believed that eHealth should be enhanced rather than substituted for personal health care, with numerous individuals expressing anxiety about conducting self-measurements and uncertainty regarding appropriate responses to abnormal readings. Conclusion: This study revealed differences in requirements and expectations among patient groups regarding self-management and indicates that aspects of eHealth and its implementation should be tailored to individual patients. The anticipated benefits of eHealth to support self-management and perceived disease controllability appeared to significantly influence patients' willingness to adopt eHealth for self-management purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.