Evidence mapPaperPMID 40969643Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Artificial intelligence-oriented predictive model for the risk of postpartum depression: a systematic review.

Jie Xia, Chen Chen, Xiuqin Lu, Tengfei Zhang, Tingting Wang, Qingling Wang, Qianqian Zhou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie Xia *School of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Chen Chen *School of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiuqin LuSchool of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Tengfei ZhangSchool of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Tingting WangSchool of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Qingling WangSchool of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Qianqian ZhouSchool of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a significant mental health concern affecting 3.5-33.0% of mothers worldwide, with potentially severe consequences for both maternal and infant well-being. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies offers new opportunities for the early prediction of PPD risk, potentially enabling timely interventions to mitigate adverse outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was conducted until October 31, 2024, using several electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. All the studies predicted the occurrence of PPD using algorithms. The review process involved dual-independent screening by two authors using predefined criteria, with discrepancies resolved through consensus discussion involving a third investigator, and assessed the quality of the included models using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). Inter-rater agreement was quantified using Cohen's Results: Eleven studies were included in the systematic review. The random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression algorithms demonstrated high predictive performance (AUROC > 0.9). The main predictors of PPD were maternal age, pregnancy stress and adverse emotions, history of mental disorders, maternal education, marital relationship, and sleep status. The overall performance of the prediction model was excellent. However, the generalizability of the model was limited, and there was a certain risk of bias. Issues such as data quality, algorithm interpretability, and the cross-cultural and cross-population applicability of the model need to be addressed. Conclusion: The model has the potential to predict the risk of PPD and provide support for early identification and intervention. Future research should optimize the model, improve its prediction accuracy, and test its applicability across cultures and populations to reduce the incidence of PPD and guarantee the mental health of pregnant and maternal women.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsartificial intelligencemachine learningpostpartum depressionpredictive modelrisk

Identifiers

PMID40969643
PMCPMC12440769

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.