ArticleArchives of internal medicine research2025
Interventions for Neural Plasticity in Stroke Recovery.
Article in Archives of internal medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timely Surgical Approaches for Pediatric Epilepsy Resistant to Medication.Journal of surgery and research · 2026Article
- Review and Meta-Analyses of the Effects of MLC601/MLC901 (NeuroAiD) on Post-Stroke Functional and Motor Recovery.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in the Late Subacute Phase After Stroke: A Single-Case Experimental Study of Robot-Assisted Therapy, rTMS, and Intensive Training for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation in the First Year After Stroke Using Modern Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Stiff Person Syndrome: Bridging Neuroimmunology and Rehabilitation for Improved Patient Outcomes.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Modern Technologies Supporting Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Neurorehabilitation technologies and functional recovery after brain injury: influence of sex, an integrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, and enhancing neural plasticity is a central strategy in promoting functional recovery. This review examines a range of interventions that target plasticity to improve outcomes in stroke survivors. Neural plasticity is assessed using neuroimaging tools, such as fMRI, EEG, and fNIRS, as well as clinical scales, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Biomarkers, like brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), GABA, and nerve growth factor (NGF), are also useful for predicting patient outcomes. These tools offer insight into recovery potential and intervention effectiveness. The interventions discussed include physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), dietary support, and emerging technologies such as virtual reality, video games, and exoskeleton-assisted training. Pharmacological strategies, including Levodopa, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and ginkgo diterpene lactone meglumine (GDLM), have shown mixed results, while stem cell therapies remain under investigation. Physical therapy remains the foundational treatment, but other interventions may provide added benefit depending on patient characteristics. This review highlights the need for a personalized, multidimensional approach to stroke rehabilitation. Continued research is necessary to refine these therapies and optimize recovery through tailored treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.