ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2025
Safety of Molnupiravir in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Molnupiravir (MOV) is recommended for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are ineligible for remdesivir treatment. However, data regarding laboratory-based adverse events (AEs) associated with MOV use in hospitalized patients are limited. In this study, we evaluated MOV-associated laboratory abnormalities, including increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and decreased hemoglobin (Hb) levels (e.g., anemia), and evaluated related risk factors in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data for 78 adult inpatients with COVID-19 who received MOV upon admission at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital. Individuals with MOV treatment history, early discontinuation, or premature discharge were excluded. Data were collected on demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, bacterial coinfection, concomitant medications, COVID-19 severity, oxygen therapy, and length of hospital stay. The AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Japanese Clinical Oncology Group. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for elevated CPK levels and anemia. Results: The median age of the study population was 82 years (interquartile range: 74 - 89 years; men: 56.4%), and 17.9% had bacterial coinfection. Twenty-seven patients (34.6%) experienced ≥ 1 AE, and MOV was discontinued in two patients because of a mild rash and CPK elevation. Elevated CPK levels and anemia each occurred in 11 patients (14.1%). Severe AEs (grade ≥ 3) were observed in one patient with grade 4 CPK elevation and in another with grade 3 anemia. Multivariate analysis showed that bacterial coinfection tended to increase CPK levels (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75 - 13.32, P = 0.10) and was significantly associated with anemia (aOR: 5.40, 95% CI: 1.27 - 23.69, P = 0.022). Conclusions: MOV exhibits a generally favorable safety profile in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with low treatment discontinuation rates and mild laboratory abnormalities. Elevated CPK levels and anemia may reflect the complications of bacterial coinfection rather than direct MOV toxicity; however, these results should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size and single-center, non-controlled study design. Further multicenter prospective studies are warranted to determine the relationship between CPK elevation, anemia, and MOV treatment in COVID-19 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.