ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Mechanisms of biliary stricture and novel therapeutic strategies.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Common Language for Post-Transplant Anastomotic Biliary Strictures: Standardized Endoscopic Outcome Definitions and a Failure-Mode Roadmap.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The efficacy of intraoperative external biliary drainage tubes for late benign biliary strictures in hepaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biliary stricture is a common yet complex pathological condition in clinical practice, which can be classified into iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic categories. Iatrogenic biliary strictures are mostly caused by cholecystectomy and hepatobiliary surgical procedures, while non-iatrogenic factors include immune-mediated, infectious, ischemic, genetic, idiopathic, and tumor-related causes. These factors induce damage to the biliary epithelium through various mechanisms, subsequently leading to bile stasis, inflammation, and fibrosis. The occurrence and progression of biliary strictures typically involve three major pathological processes: epithelial regeneration, inflammatory response, and fibrotic deposition. Following injury, the biliary epithelium can be repaired and maintained through mechanisms such as cholangiocyte proliferation, hepatocyte transdifferentiation, and activation of biliary stem/progenitor cells; meanwhile, the inflammatory response plays a dual role by promoting epithelial repair while also facilitating the progression of fibrosis. Multiple signaling pathways exert central regulatory roles throughout these processes. Currently, treatment strategies for biliary strictures have gradually evolved from traditional surgical interventions, such as hepaticojejunostomy and liver transplantation, to non-surgical approaches including immune modulation, bile acid metabolism regulation, and gut microbiota interventions. In recent years, novel therapeutic strategies for biliary strictures have emerged, including molecular therapies targeting fibrosis-related signaling pathways, gene-editing technologies, regenerative replacement therapies, and the development of advanced tissue-engineered scaffolds. These emerging approaches are expected to offer more efficient and safer solutions for the precision treatment of biliary strictures in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.