Evidence mapPaperPMID 40969811Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Correlation of peripheral blood pressure with central blood pressure and estimation of central blood pressure thresholds for diagnosis of hypertension during pregnancy.

Xolani B Mbongozi, Stuart D R Galloway, Angus Hunter, Charles B Businge, Mirabel Nanjoh, Geoffrey A B Buga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xolani B MbongoziDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
Stuart D R GallowayFaculty of Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Angus HunterFaculty of Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Charles B BusingeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
Mirabel NanjohDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
Geoffrey A B BugaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of the study was to evaluate the correlation and comparative use of peripheral blood pressure and central blood pressure (CBP) in identifying hypertension among pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital from December 2022 to April 2024, involving 270 inpatients diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and 270 normotensive controls in their second and third trimesters. Blood pressure measurements were obtained using the Microlife WatchBP Office Central, both at enrolment and within 7 days postpartum. A linear regression equation and a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used to determine the thresholds for normal, mild, and severe CBP. Results: The ROC revealed that a central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) of 116 mm Hg or higher has a sensitivity of 78.5% and a specificity of 50.3% for diagnosing hypertension during pregnancy. Considering a normal peripheral diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg, the upper limit of central diastolic blood pressure (cDBP) in normotensive controls was calculated to be 78 mm Hg. A significant positive correlation was found between peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) and cSBP among normotensive and hypertensive women ( Conclusion: This study established the threshold values for central hypertension as 116/78 mmHg, with severe central hypertension defined as 148/95 mmHg or more. It reinforces the positive correlation between peripheral and CBP in both normotensive and hypertensive populations. CBP may serve as a better parameter for evaluating hypertension, especially in eclampsia. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and to explore their clinical implications.

Indexed as

arterial stiffnesscentral and peripheral hypertensioneclampsiahypertensive disorders of pregnancypreeclampsiapregnant women

Identifiers

PMID40969811
PMCPMC12440860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.