ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
A Computational Glucoregulatory Model of Liver and Glucagon for the Evaluation of Therapeutics.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models of the glucoregulatory system constitute a powerful tool for preclinical evaluation and mechanistic insight into therapeutics. However, in the case of diabetes, there is a dearth of physiological models capable of accurately describing the hormone glucagon, which is important for the study and design of new classes of therapeutics, such as glucose-responsive glucagon (GRG). In this work, we construct a physiological compartment model, IMPACT 2.0, which integrates a refined liver submodel and explicit whole-body glucagon kinetics. Key mechanistic enhancements include glucose transporter dynamics, receptor binding, and hepatic glycogen metabolism, allowing for the improved prediction of glucose excursions in response to both insulin- and glucagon-based therapeutics. Model validation against experimental data from healthy and diabetic rats demonstrated accurate glucose predictions following insulin and glucagon administration. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate our model's identifiability in the case of insulin or glucagon subcutaneous injections. By comparing diabetic and healthy model fits, we found that 16 of the 37 fitting parameters were significantly different between the health states. Additionally, we applied IMPACT 2.0 to evaluate a recently developed GRG based on controlled release via a microneedle patch, illustrating its utility in mechanistic drug design and bridging in vitro characterization with physiological outcomes. By offering a physiologically detailed and validated framework for glucagon and liver metabolism, IMPACT 2.0 is an improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model that will be valuable for accelerating drug discovery, optimizing GRG formulations, and informing the design of closed-loop insulin and glucagon therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.