Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970042›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Future of Dental Implants: A Narrative Review of Trends, Technologies, and Patient Considerations.

Johnson Raja James, Avina Kharat, Suresh Chinnakutti, Snehal Kamble, Mita Mandal, Anubhav Das

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johnson Raja JamesDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Tirunelveli, IND.
Avina KharatDepartment of Pharmacology, Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Indore, IND.
Suresh ChinnakuttiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Salem, IND.
Snehal KambleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bhausaheb Mulak Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Nagpur, IND.
Mita MandalDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kolkata, IND.
Anubhav DasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review examines recent advancements in dental implantology, emphasizing innovative materials, digital technologies, and patient-centered approaches that improve treatment outcomes. Implant systems have progressed from traditional titanium to biocompatible alternatives such as zirconia, titanium-zirconium alloys, and scaffold-based designs, enabling enhanced integration and durability. The review draws on literature published between 2015 and 2025, identified through structured searches of biomedical databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Developments in artificial intelligence, robotics, and 3D printing have enhanced surgical precision and planning accuracy; however, their clinical adoption remains limited by high costs, steep learning curves, and inconsistent long-term data. While bioactive surfaces, regenerative biomolecules, and minimally invasive techniques contribute to better healing outcomes, their accessibility and regulatory approval vary widely across regions. Smart implants with sensor technologies show promise for real-time monitoring but lack robust clinical validation and standardization. Ethical concerns surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) integration, patient data privacy, and equitable access further complicate implementation. Incorporating sustainable practices and personalized treatment strategies may enhance the predictability and success of implant procedures, but these must be weighed against economic and logistical constraints. These considerations underscore the need for critical evaluation as implant dentistry undergoes a paradigm shift in modern oral rehabilitation.

Indexed as

3d printingartificial intelligencebiocompatibilityimplantologyosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID40970042
PMCPMC12442331

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.